Friday, October 16, 2009

Retreat

In order to keep my sanity and sense, I help lead a personal growth Retreat every six months. This is then. Will return Sunday afternoon, but have no idea when I'll be posting again, as My Chief has Mondays off. Might jump back here then, but might still be dealing with Retreat Headache...just have to wait and see. Hope your weekend is productive and restful.

See you next week!

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Toxic Hawaiian Volcano Poses Health Risks to Residents, Crops - FOXNews.com

Toxic Hawaiian Volcano Poses Health Risks to Residents, Crops - FOXNews.com

Legend has it that people were thrown into the volcano to appease the gods. How 'bout we try throwing Akaka and Inouye into the volcano...you know, just to see if it works.

We have here another case of not being able to control Mother Nature. Like the folks who build their home on a barrier island, then want a replacement of house and all contents when it's wiped out by a hurricane, these are obviously cases of ignoring Nature's past...and then expecting payment when Nature comes 'round again...as she does.

From the article:

Those affected note the trade winds are blowing the vog towards Oahu, where the state legislature presides. Their hope is that lawmakers will be able to see and smell the problem a little bit more clearly.

Oh, you can bet the 'lawmakers' will smell a problem - a problem "government money" can solve!

Residents remember that, afterall, there wouldn't be a Hawaiian Islands Chain without volcanic activity — it's what formed and shaped the tropical islands.

Kilauea does what Kilauea has always done. And politicians do what politicians have always done.

I'd put my money on the volcano in this one...if the government doesn't take it and redistribute it to someone else...

Posted using ShareThis

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

You call this 'classy?'

I call it the ugliest damn doll I have EVER seen.

Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you The Michelle Doll -
doll
just in time for Christmas!

The icing on the cake of this story has to be that the seller is - ready? - JAILBREAK TOYS! Yes, that's real, and no, I'm not providing a link, you can google it like I did.

Hasn't this made your whole day now? Don't you feel SPECIAL!?!

ADDITION: I can't help but think that Jackie O would have been horrified at any depiction of herself that was this...inaccurate. Of course, she was too classy to have EVER said anything.

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Tuesday means Thomas Sowell

Mr. Sowell's column today has nothing at all to do with his opinion - or mine - of the Nobel committee. Aren't you thrilled about that? I DID find a column about that - by Rich Lowry - that you might want to take the time to read. Let's just say that it isn't complimentary to any of the participants.

Mr. Sowell speaks about economics in a way that even I understand, and he uses examples I can understand. Every politician who wears the label 'Elected Official' should be required take lessons from him...but of course, real Servants of the Republic would already know that, wouldn't they. The doublespeak and gobbledygook we get from them is DESIGNED to keep us ignorant of what they're really up to, because serving the cause of the People of the United States is not on their personal agenda. Making money and being reelected is their agenda. Sad, but so true. Some bits from the column that reminds us that THEY DON'T REPRESENT US:

Back in the days of the Soviet Union, two Russian economists who had never lived in a country with a free market economy understood something about market economies that many others who have lived in such economies all their lives have never understood. Nikolai Shmelev and Vladimir Popov said: "Everything is interconnected in the world of prices, so that the smallest change in one element is passed along the chain to millions of others."

...

While this may be easy enough to understand, its implications are completely lost on many people in politics and in the media. If everything is connected to everything else in a market economy, then it makes no sense to have laws and policies that declare some given goal to be a "good thing," without regard to the repercussions, which spread out in all directions, like waves that spread across a pond when you drop a rock in the water.
...

We are now living with those repercussions, which include the worst unemployment in decades. That is the price we are paying for increasing home ownership from 64 percent to 69 percent.
...

Mortgage lending standards were lowered, in order to raise the magic number of home ownership. But, with lower lending standards, there were — surprise! — more mortgage payment delinquencies, defaults and foreclosures.
...

The other big lie is that this was a failure of economists and others to foresee that the housing boom would turn to bust and set off financial repercussions across the economy.

In reality, everybody and his brother saw it coming and said so — including yours truly in the Wall Street Journal of May 26, 2005. As far away as London, The Economist magazine warned about the danger. So did many American publications and individuals. The problem was that politicians refused to listen.

UPDATE: If you can, please forgive any spelling or grammatical errors in post or headline. MOST times, I know how to write according to the way I was taught by mum, grandmother, and a few assorted teachers...but that doesn't mean that what my brain knows necessarily translates to my fingertips!

20 Questions - that's 20 MORE

John Hawkins at Townhall.com has a few more questions he'd like SOMEONE, ANYONE to ask BarryO, at the earliest opportunity. A small sample:

13) So far, you have signed a number of bills that no one in Congress has read before they were signed. Do you think a member of Congress is being irresponsible if he signs onto a bill without reading it or at minimum, having a member of his staff read it?

14) Would you be willing to publicly ask your supporters to stop accusing people who disagree with your policies of being racist?

Now remember, finding a 'reporter' in this world of Journalists For Barry Fan Club who would actually ASK the questions is gonna be difficult. Getting the Whiner-In-Chief (changed that - thanks to No Sheeples Here) to ANSWER such questions - given the staging and planting of Q&A sessions we've already seen - may be asking just a bit much of American Media.

One can only 'hope.'

Monday, October 12, 2009

Onion staff sit on Nobel committee?

Robert Tracinski at JewishWorldReview.com writes:

The Nobel Committee says that prize is "for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples." Which Obama has accomplished by—what exactly? Giving a speech at the UN?

I know, I know, columns and articles and probably talking head news stories (I don't watch television news, so I don't know for sure) on this are all over the place, and after a full weekend, we're probably a bit overloaded on the whole damn topic. But dammit, Tracinski is FUNNY and I never turn down a good bit of snark!

Then there's the part that isn't JUST snark, it's deadly serious:

This is an attempt by the Nobel committee to play on Obama's vanity in order to influence his decisions on Iran and Afghanistan. The message is: how could you possibly let Israel attack Iran's nuclear facilities, or how could you send an additional 40,000 troops to "escalate" the war in Afghanistan—after we've just given you the Nobel Peace Prize?

In appealing to Obama's moral vanity, they know their man well—and it will probably work.

The Nobel Committee may have inadvertantly caused the deaths of American Soldiers, but that isn't what's preeminent in their minds...their utopian idea of 'peace' is uppermost in their minds, and they seem to be of the mind that this will help that plan along.

It would be a very amusing joke...if it weren't for the bloodshed they're going to cause.

Saturday, October 10, 2009

Go Navy!

Navy Midshipmen 63 - Rice Owls 14


Oct 10 1 2 3 4 T
Navy 14 21 14 14 63 «
Rice 0 7 0 7 14

Next game: @ Southern Methodist Mustangs, Oct 17 8:00pm ET

I didn't see one play of this game...looks like it was a walk in the park for these young men. Other than being glad of the 4-2 record, I really can't think of anything to say.

GO NAVY!

Tinnitus --- WHAT???

Being the doctor-averse lil broad that I am, I have diagnosed my own affliction. Now I need to figure out what to do about it. My particular 'ringing' seems to be a bit like the computer being on all the time, but with a slightly different pitch. *sigh*

Dr. Gott's column has been mentioning Lypo-Flavonoid for quite some time, but I didn't pay much attention after I told My Chief about it...because HIS tinnitus has been diagnosed for several years. Mine was intermittent and didn't interfere with anything, so I ignored it. Now it interferes with my hearing more often than not. So I'll be checking the price of this stuff, and having a visit with my doc in the near future. Not in the next WEEK, as I'm covered up prepping to lead a Retreat...but NEAR future, anyway.

Think I'll go find something to eat, y'all have a FINE day, and thanks for stopping by! Stay warm - ya lucky dogs...

Friday, October 9, 2009

All Foam...No Beer

I honestly didn't believe I could be more disgusted by BarryO and the Merry Men than I was. I didn't think I could be as nauseated over a "Peace" Prize recipient as I was when the announcement was made that Arafat and Carter had won.

After all, Carter and his Confederates had allowed the country to suffer through the insanity of the hostage-taking in Iran, not to mention helping to drive the country into a deep recession.

Arafat preached and worked toward the destruction of the State of Israel and the death of the Jews, with Jimmuh his willing companion.

I was WRONG.

It seems BarryO has 'won' the "Peace" Prize by his mere existence. Wow. The Nobel committee has handed this jackass the award after less than a full year on the job. Since nothing has changed except the escalation of war in various places around the world, not to mention the world economy - and the AMERICAN economy - going into the sewer, I have to conclude once more that those 'esteemed' geniuses who make up the committee are, in fact, bent on destroying the Free World.

Paco used the term "A World Turned Upside Down." Indeed. You can find the transcript of the official press release at Camp of the Saints.

An exerpt from Meredith Jessup at Townhall.com:


Obama beat out
"Zimbabwe's Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai, a Colombian senator and a Chinese dissident, along with an Afghan woman's rights activist."

I know we're at war right now and that war is bad, but I would just like to point out this bit of irony: if it hadn't been for "the evil one," President George W. Bush, and the U.S. military's efforts in ridding Afghanistan of the Taliban's tyrannic rule, I'd imagine there would be no "Afghan woman's rights activist" around today to even be considered for this award.

...
So correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't this essentially mean Obama received this award for making some good speeches? Sure nothing he says has actually been accomplished, but it all sounds good!

All mouth, no ass. All booster, no payload. Yep, that's our BarryO.

Doesn't this make ya PROUD, America?

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

I love Thomas Sowell

Anyone who reads this blog for more than a week knows I think Thomas Sowell is the cat's meow. He writes a "Random Thoughts on the passing scene" column every so often, and I think they may be my favorites. Here are some of his thoughts for today, which I found at JewishWorldReview.com, but are also found at Townhall.com:

When politicians propose some hugely expensive new program and are asked how the government is going to pay for it, a standard ploy over the years has been to claim that they will pay for it by eliminating "waste, fraud and abuse." At a recent town hall meeting, a citizen raised the obvious question: If you can do that, why haven't you done it already?

What is called "universal health care" can turn out to be universal "don't care" medical treatment, when Washington bureaucrats can over-rule what you and your doctor want to do.

After political crusades for "affordable housing" ended up ruining the housing market and much of the economy with it, many of the same politicians are now carrying on a crusade for "affordable health care."

Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez, Muammar Qaddafi and Vladimir Putin have all praised Barack Obama. When enemies of freedom and democracy praise your president, what are you to think?

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Happy Birthday, Pixie!


Two years ago today, Lovely Daughter and Handsome Son-in-law presented me with the best gift ever...well, since Lovely Daughter was born, anyway.

Arrival of this little blond Pixie Bug has changed my life. As we get older, I think we forget how much fun Life can be, how simple we can keep it if we wish, and how fascinating things are when looked at through the eyes of a toddler.

I am truly grateful to have the opportunity to learn, again, what Life is all about.

Happy Birthday, Kaylee!!!

Wish I'd written this column

I've enjoyed George Will's writing on baseball for many years now, even when I don't quite 'get' it. I'm not a detail-minded guru of the game, I'm a lowly little late-comer of a fan. His political commentary, on the other hand, sometimes brings on the computer-age verson of the glassy-eyed stare - click!

This column
, however, has so much for me to love about it. In reviewing the pleas from BarryO and his Bride to the IOC, Will says:

Both Obamas gave heartfelt speeches about . . . themselves. Although the working of the committee's mind is murky, it could reasonably have rejected Chicago's bid for the 2016 Games on aesthetic grounds — unless narcissism has suddenly become an Olympic sport.

In the 41 sentences of her remarks, Michelle Obama used some form of the personal pronouns "I" or "me" 44 times. Her husband was, comparatively, a shrinking violet, using those pronouns only 26 times in 48 sentences. Still, 70 times in 89 sentences conveyed the message that somehow their fascinating selves were what made, or should have made, Chicago's case compelling.

I like every paragraph of this column, but in the interest of interest (yours), I'll add just a bit more that says SO much -- about BarryO, about Bride of BarryO, and about those who elected this pompous, arrogant windbag.

Nine days before speaking in Copenhagen, the president, addressing the United Nations General Assembly, intoned: "No one nation can or should try to dominate another nation." What was the speechwriter thinking when he or she assembled that sentence? The "should" was empty moralizing; the "can" was nonsense redundantly refuted by history. Does our Cicero even glance at his speeches before reading them in public?

Becoming solemn in Copenhagen, Obama said: "No one expects the Games to solve all our collective problems." That's right, no one does. So why say that? Then, shifting into the foggy sentimentalism of standard Olympics blather, he said "peaceful competition between nations represents what's best about our humanity" and "it brings us together" and "it helps us to understand one another."

Actually, sometimes the Olympic Games are a net subtraction from international comity. But Obama quickly returned to speaking about . . . himself:

NOTE: I have something on a more personal level coming up, so link and comments about Thomas Sowell's column will be posted at a later time. Thanks for your consideration!

Sunday, October 4, 2009

Roar! 37-17

For ten years now, the Tennessee Titans have been more hated by Jaguars fans than maybe even Osama bin Laden. The Titans beat the Jaguars 3 times in 1999, in what many thought was a sure run to the Superbowl. In 2004, there was another humiliating loss to the rivals from Nashville. Tennessee once claimed that Jacksonville was their other 'home field.' The Jaguars may not go to the Superbowl this year, may not even make the playoffs...but the Titans took a beating at the hands of the Big Cats today, and there is some comfort in that. This is a bit like the Army-Navy game...it's almost ok if that's the only win Navy gets ALL YEAR LONG.

The win today puts my hometown team back to a 2-2 record, which is nothing to be ashamed of in this world...unless you're a Football Dynasty (we'll know about the 'boys later today), and the Jaguars haven't achieved that. They DID hand the Titans a record of 0-4 -- that's ZERO and FOUR. No one deserves that record more.

Go Jaguars!

UPDATE: "America's Team" (I lived there when they were God, separately and as a group - it was disgusting...I wore a Steelers shirt for YEARS in response - and because I had a crush on Rocky Bleier) has a spectacular record of 2-2 after getting whupped by the Broncos today. Last time the 'boys beat Denver was 1995. HA!

I am a child of the Cold War.

Grouchy Conservative Pundits has a great bunch of folks who think well and write well what they think. Take this post, f'rinstance - Threats, Then and Now:

I am a child of the Cold War. I grew up with the ever-present threat of nuclear annihilation.

School was frequently interrupted by "duck and cover" drills.

Many popular movies were based on nuclear testing, nuclear war or it's aftermath - Them!, Fail Safe, On the Beach.

Read it all, and the comments. It won't be a waste of your time.

Go Navy!!! (from yesterday, been busy, sorry)

Navy Midshipmen Football (3-2)


Navy Midshipmen 16 - Air Force Falcons 13
Next game: @ Rice Owls, Oct 10 3:30pm ET

Saturday, October 3, 2009

Top 10 Reasons Chicago Didn't Get the Olympics

Top 10 Reasons Chicago Didn't Get the Olympics - Rich Lowry at The Corner on NRO

10. Dead people can't vote at IOC meetings.

9. Obama distracted by 25 min meeting with General McChrystal.

8. Who cares if Obama couldn't talk the IOC into Chicago? He'll be able to talk Iran out of nukes.

7. The impediment is Israel still building settlements.

6. Obviously no president would have been able to acomplish it.

5. We've been quite clear and said all along that we didn't want the Olympics.

4. This isn't about the number of Olympics "lost", it's about the number of Olympics "saved" or "created."

3. Clearly not enough wise Latina judges on the committee

2. Because the IOC is racist.

1. It's George Bush's fault.

Shared via AddThis

Go Irish!

Washington Huskies 30 - Notre Dame Fighting Irish 37


Oct 3 1 2 3 4 OT T
Washington 7 10 7 6 0 30
Notre Dame 3 13 3 11 7 37 «
Next game: vs. USC Trojans, Oct 17 3:30pm ET

Friday, October 2, 2009

Jonah Goldberg likes controversy!

Jonah's column at JewishWorldReview.com has this about Polanski and the rallying cry to Free Roman that resounds from apologists and elitists and intelligentsia - you know, Our Betters:

The arguments in Polanski's defense range from lawyerly red herrings to intellectual piffle to horrendous affronts to human decency.


Roman Polanski is a pig - with apologies to the 4-footed animal. He LIKES teenagers. Let me rephrase that - he likes to have sex with teenagers, and he doesn't seem to care if they disagree with that idea.

It all boils down to the fact that Polanski is famous and talented and an Olympian artist, living above the world of mortals. Indeed, if he didn't rape that girl -- and he did -- Polanski would still be considered a pig in most normal communities. This is the man who, after all, started dating Nastassja Kinski when she was only 15 and he was in his 40s. His taste for teenage girls is an established fact.

I remember some things about being a teenager. I was just a bit older than Nastassja Kinski when she started "dating" Polanski. I thought it was pathetic, that she must have some sort of real problem if she could find someone my father's age sexy and interesting enough to "date." (I dated - and I DATED him, not "dated" him - a man who was 9 years older than me, when I was 17, but he wasn't old enough to be my father, fercryinoutloud. After a few weeks I realized he was still FAR too 'old' for me, and I broke up with him - in a typically rude teenager way.) My attitude about that huge age difference, then and now - ick. And my boyfriend never broke the law.

His defenders don't care. They are above and beyond bourgeois notions of morality, even legality.

And that's the main reason I am grateful for this controversy. It is a dye marker, "lighting up" a whole archipelago of morally wretched people. With their time, their money and their craft, these very people routinely lecture America about what is right and wrong. It's good to know that at the most fundamental level, they have no idea what they're talking about.

Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Mustn't muddy the water with those pesky little "Facts!"

I don't watch the news. I don't read a daily newspaper. Any news I DO hear is posted on someone's blog (and I generally read conservative and libertarian blogs), or comes from the news-on-the-half-hour on the sports-talk or talk radio stations I listen to. I also check my home-state online newspapers free content. And a couple of good friends or relatives email me with links to things they think I oughta read...and I don't mean chain mail. Military funerals, Weather or giant pythons appearing somewhere other than a zoo might get me a link to a story.

It's enough to get me by. Knowing how many thugs were shot by the police or each other, what stupid-ass thing my Representative said as she feathers her nest, and how "hard" the city council is "working" aren't priorities in my life.

As a matter of fact, I don't even need to know what the official unemployment numbers are. Numbers can lie when they're spun the right direction...and then can be spun right back the other way for a WHOLE new perspective.

I know some people out of work. I know a couple people who got work...but left the city of their choice to do so. When it's move or collect welfare, my generation tends to hit the road, I think. Then again, maybe it's not my generation. The ones I'm thinking of ARE my generation, but they're also not "city folk." They're the product of small town and rural upbringing. Are we more self-reliant at this age if we grew up without government intervention in every aspect of our lives? If so, what does that say about government intervention in every aspect of our lives?

John Stossel is one of my libertarian/ Constitutionalist heroes. From his column at JewishWorldReview.com:


OK, economic forecasters make mistakes. Fair enough. But neither the administration experts nor President Obama will acknowledge that their models and strategy are flawed. Instead, they spin the numbers and proclaim success, insisting that the plan is working even though unemployment is higher than they said it would be.

For example, Christina Romer, chief of the president's Council of Economic Advisers, preferred to emphasize that the 216,000 jobs lost in August were about half a million less than six months before. Never mind that the economic strategy hasn't restored any of those 700,000 jobs previously lost. They'd rather distract us by focusing on the slowing rate of loss rather than the losses themselves.

Lord knows these brilliant folks can't be WRONG in their predictions. Of course, I don't give them as much credit as Stossel does. I think they knew what would happen all along and lied. And since "journalism" no longer requires investigating and reporting FACTS, no one catches the lies.

UPDATE: Track-A-'Crat has written about the Road to Hell...of course, he doesn't call it that, and neither do our helpful socialist friends in government bureaurcacy, but it is what it is. Thanks, Track!

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Tuesday is time for Thomas Sowell - "Do we want to become the world's largest banana republic?"

Thomas Sowell's column this morning is spot on about the dangers of brilliant people running things. I don't know about you, but I was under the impression that everyday workin' folk know more about living Life, solving Problems, and overcoming Troubles than any book- and classroom-educated Ph.D. Of course, Intelligent, Educated People with the right letters after their names, having been 'educated' far beyond their own intelligence at The Finest Centers of Learning, don't believe that for a second. Doesn't change the facts, does it?

There is usually only a limited amount of damage that can be done by dull or stupid people. For creating a truly monumental disaster, you need people with high IQs.

Such people have been told all their lives how brilliant they are, until finally they feel forced to admit it, with all due modesty. But they not only tend to over-estimate their own brilliance, more fundamentally they tend to over-estimate how important brilliance itself is when dealing with real world problems.

Many crucial things in life are learned from experience, rather than from clever thoughts or clever words. Indeed, a gift for the clever phrasing so much admired by the media can be a fatal talent, especially for someone chosen to lead a government.

Make no mistake about it - most people, most Americans, for that matter, are not dull or stupid. Eventually, by relying on our God-given instincts and following the principles of the Constitution of the United States, we come around, even when we've been lied to by omission or commission, even when we've been somewhat willfully blind and deaf to Reality.